| January 1997, Vol. 29, No. 1
|
Clinical
Practice in Academic Medical Center Departments of Family Medicine
The Association of Departments of Family Medicine
Task Force on Clinical Practice in US Family Medicine Departments
in Academic Medical Centers
Background and Objectives: Conducted by
a task force of the Association of Departments of Family Medicine,
this study defines current issues in the clinical practice
of academic departments of family medicine in US medical schools.
Methods: A survey instrument on departmental
demographics, funding, teaching, and governance in regard
to clinical practice was sent to 130 family medicine department
chairs or other key contacts in US medical schools. A total
of 106 usable responses were obtained, for an 81.5% response
rate.
Results: Results indicate that, in response
to a need to increase clinical practice income, academic medical
centers (AMCs) and departments are increasingly hiring physician
faculty for positions that mainly involve patient care, although
at salaries less than the community level. In spite of increasing
departmental responsibilities in predoctoral and resident
education and clinical practice, much teaching is done by
community physicians. There is significant purchasing of community
practices and growing involvement of the AMCs in the practice
activities of departments. Two thirds of clinical chairs reported
"pretty good" to "great" satisfaction on a five-point scale.
Conclusions: Departments of family medicine
are increasing their practice activities, perhaps to the detriment
of teaching and research. The clinical practice autonomy of
departments of family medicine is being diluted by increased
institutional control and by mergers with the practices of
other primary care disciplines. These changes give rise to
a reasonable concern that academic departments of family medicine
and their faculty may give up control of their clinical practice
and lose their identity through conversion to "generic" primary
care departments and providers.
Special Article
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):15-20.)
|
| |
Skills
Actively Performed During a Family Medicine Community-based
Preceptorship
Craig L. Gjerde, PhD; George C. Xakellis,
MD, MBA; Barcey T. Levy, PhD, MD
Background: This study assessed the clinical
learning experiences provided to third-year medical students
during a 2-week, required, community-based family medicine
preceptorship.
Methods: After completing the preceptorship,
students classified their level of performance on 80 clinical
activities. During 3 academic years, 486 third-year students
completed the preceptorship.
Results: Delivery of well-child care was
the only prevention skill in which a high percentage of students
(more than 67%) received experience; students received moderate
experience (34%-67% of students) with another seven prevention
skills. Students received a high level of active experience
with four clinical problems: upper respiratory tract infection,
acute otitis media, sinusitis, and strep throat, and a moderate
level of active experience on another 17 clinical problems.
There were no procedural skills on which students received
a high level of experience, but students received a moderate
level of experience with 10 procedural skills.
Conclusions: This brief family medicine
preceptorship provided a clinical setting in which students
actively engaged in several facets of ambulatory primary care.
For accountability, programs need to more clearly articulate
what exposure is to be gained in each clinical rotation, strive
to enhance active practice, and document levels of student
performance.
Educational Research
and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):21-26.)
|
| |
Using
Standardized Patients in Licensing/Certification Examinations:
Comparison of Two Tests in Canada
Paul Grand'Maison, MD, MSc; Carlos A. Brailovsky,
MD, MA; Joelle Lescop, MD, MPH; Paul Rainsberry, PhD
Background: A new licensing examination
for family physicians was introduced in the Province of Quebec,
Canada, in 1990. It contains a newly developed, standardized,
patient-based objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)
used in complementarity with two other instruments (Short
Answers Management Problems [SAMPs] and Simulated Office Orals
[SOOs]) that have been used for many years by the College
of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) for certification purposes.
This research studied the criterion validity of the OSCE using
the last instruments as criteria.
Methods: The results of the 172 spring
1994 candidates were analyzed. Cronbach alpha reliability
coefficients were computed. Pearson's correlation coefficients
and regression analysis measured the extent to which scores
on the new Quebec OSCE correlated with the scores on the CFPC
instruments.
Results: Correlation coefficients were
significant between the Quebec OSCE scores and the CFPC examination
total scores (.700), the SAMPs scores (.634), and the SOOs
scores (.514). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that
scores on the Quebec OSCE explained a significant but still
limited proportion of the variation in scores of the CFPC
examination.
Discussion: This study supports the criterion
validity of the Quebec OSCE used in the licensing examination.
However, differences in the skills assessed by each instrument
and in the clinical situations presented exist between the
Quebec instrument and the two national instruments. These
differences, plus the variation in the scores obtained by
the candidates on the three instruments, support the decision
of the Quebec licensing organization to use them in complementarity.
Educational Research
and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):27-32.)
|
| |
Family
Practice Residency Program Directors' Views on Research
Mark J. DeHaven, PhD; George R. Wilson, MD;
Duaine D. Murphree, MD; John P. Grundig
Background and Objectives: The culture
of family practice training programs does little to convince
residents that research is a worthwhile and important activity.
The traditional dichotomy between research and clinical medicine
persists today, despite an identified clinical mission for
research.
Methods: As part of an effort to build
the research capacity of family practice training programs,
a telephone survey was administered in August 1995 to the
program directors of all residency programs listed in the
American Academy of Family Physicians 1995 Directory of Family
Practice Residency Programs. The directors were asked about
their program's research environment, features designed to
promote research activity, and the level of resident research
productivity.
Results: More than half (53.6%) of the
program directors felt that their training program actively
promotes research. Three out of four indicated that involving
residents in research is a goal of their program. However,
only four of 10 (40.8%) programs provide specific time for
research, and family practice residents appear to be relatively
inactive by conventional measures of research productivity.
Conclusions: Research appears to be developing
a limited role in family practice training programs. Resident
research productivity remains relatively low and may be a
result of residency programs not providing specific time for
participating in research. However, the program directors'
supportive attitudes may contribute to research and scholarly
activity becoming an integral part of a family physicianÍs
training.
Educational Research
and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):33-7.)
|
| |
Evidence-based
Management of Upper Respiratory Infection in a Family Practice
Teaching Clinic
Jennifer A. English; Kay A. Bauman, MD, MPH
Background and Objectives: Management of
upper respiratory infection (URI) was examined in a family
practice clinic to determine evidence-based practices, specifically
for medication choice. Scientific evidence supports the use
of decongestants and perhaps decongestant/antihistamine combinations
in adolescents and adults and antipyretics in all age groups.
The use of cold preparations for children younger than age
5 is not evidence based.
Methods: Data on demographics, medications
prescribed, and over-the-counter medications recommended were
collected from patient charts for 293 URI visits over a 6-month
period. The cost of evidence-based URI treatment was compared
with the cost of nonevidence-based treatment.
Results: Thirty-three percent of patients
younger than age 5 were given a prescription; 96% of the prescription
cost in this age group was nonevidence based. Twenty-six percent
of all patients seen were given unnecessary and potentially
harmful medication. These unnecessary medications accounted
for almost 60% of the total prescription cost. Various combinations
of antihistamines, decongestants, and antitussives were most
commonly prescribed.
Conclusions: Few medications have been
shown to effectively alleviate the symptoms of the generally
self-limited, benign common cold. Medications are often overprescribed,
escalating health care costs and, in some cases, exposing
the patient to dangerous side effects. Family physicians and
educators are encouraged to reexamine their treatment and
teaching practices for the common cold.
Clinical Research
and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):38-6.)
|
| |
A
Method for Assigning Authorship in Multiauthored Publications
Syed M. Ahmed, MD, MPH, DrPH; Cheryl A. Maurana,
PhD; Judith A. Engle, MA; David E. Uddin, PhD; Kathleen D. Glaus,
PhD
Background and Objectives: Determining
authorship for publications is often a difficult process,
even more so when individuals from several disciplines collaborate
with community organizations to conduct projects. Although
multidisciplinary and community-academic partnerships provide
fertile ground for publication efforts, disputes about authorship
and ownership of data may hinder efforts to disseminate information.
This article describes a process for dealing with authorship
in multi-professional collaborations. It provides an authorship
scale, similar to a neonatal Apgar scale, to determine order
of authorship in multi-professional projects. Key components
or activities in the process of authorship are identified,
and points are assigned to each component in proportion to
an investigator's level of activity in each component/activity.
Scores are summed and can range from 1 to 35 for each author.
The order of authorship is then determined by the relative
score of each participant.
Faculty
Development
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):42-4.)
|
| |
Collegial
Networking and Faculty Vitality
Scott E. Woods, MD, MPH; Alfred Reid, MA; Jane
E. Arndt, MA; Peter Curtis, MD; Frank T. Stritter, PhD
Background: This research explored the relationship
between collegial networking and faculty "vitality" among
graduates of the family medicine faculty development fellowship
at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Faculty
vitality was defined by retention in full-time teaching, job
satisfaction, academic activity, and contributions to the
discipline.
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 170
family physician graduates of the 1980-1992 fellowship classes.
After a mail and telephone follow-up, the response rate was
85%. Data were collected on career history, professional interests,
professional relationships, assessment of fellowship, and
professional activities.
Results: Respondents with collegial networks
were more likely to participate in several academic activities
and were more likely to remain in full-time teaching. No association
was found between collegial networks and satisfaction or contributions
to the discipline. There were only small differences in effect
between intra-departmental and extra-departmental collegial
networks. Stratification by program type and gender revealed
no evidence of effect modification or confounding.
Conclusions: Collegial networks influence
some aspects of faculty vitality, particularly retention in
full-time teaching. Further research is needed to fully understand
its impact.
Faculty
Development
(Fam Med 1997;29(1):45-9.)
|
|
|