 |
| |
| November-December 1997, Vol. 29, No. 10
|
| |
Twenty Years
of Consulting for Excellence: The Residency Assistance Program
Gerald R. Hejduk, MA; Norman B. Kahn, Jr,
MD; Daniel J. Ostergaard, MD
Background and Objectives: The Residency
Assistance Program (RAP) in family practice was established
in 1975 to provide consultative assistance to family practice
residency program directors interested in enhancing the quality
of their training programs. Since its inception, RAP activities
have been monitored and policies approved by a project board,
with representation from all the national family medicine/practice
organizations. The voluntary, confidential, nonpunitive, collaborative
problem-solving process has provided more than 800 RAP consultations
in RAP's 20 years of operation. This paper reviews the historical
development, current status, and future directions of the
program.
Special Article
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):696-700.)
Competency-based
Education in Family Practice
Hershey S. Bell, MD; Stanley M. Kozakowski,
MD; Robin 0. Winter, MD
Background and Objectives: Since their inception,
family practice residency programs have been designed on a
rotation-based format. It has been assumed that by having
residents rotate through a series of educational experiences,
they would assimilate the skills necessary to effectively
serve as a family physician. An alternative approach is based
on the attainment of competency, rather than on the completion
of a set of experiences. This method of education is known
as competency-based education, mastery learning, or, more
recently, outcomes-based assessment. Within family medicine,
there is a strong interest in the application of competency-based
education to family practice residency training. In response
to the growing need to discuss these and other related issues,
the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Board created
the Task Force on Competency-based Education. Its mission
is to disseminate this educational theory to STFM's membership.
This article reviews the theory of competency-based education,
describes development of a competency-based curriculum model,
and discusses the academic issues surrounding adaptation of
this form of education to family practice residency programs.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):701-4.)
Resident Partnerships:
A Tool for Enhancing Ambulatory Training
Patricia Adam, MD, MSPH; Harold A. Williamson
Jr, MD, MSPH; Steven C. Zweig, MD, MSPH
Background and Objectives: This study examined
resident partnerships and their effect on graduates' practice
patterns. Methods: The study authors surveyed graduates from
a residency program that used resident partnerships. We also
surveyed the graduates' current practice partners, and they
served as a comparison group.
Results: The graduates' response rate was
86%, and their current practice partners' response rate was
61%. Graduates from a partnership program rated themselves
better trained for outpatient medicine and more comfortable
communicating with other physicians and working within a patient
care team; they were also slightly less likely to practice
inpatient medicine. Reported benefits during residency included
enhanced availability for continuity clinics, more emotional
and intellectual support, and more flexible work schedules.
Conclusions: Graduates valued partnerships during their training
and reported being better prepared to work with other physicians
in ambulatory settings.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):705-8.)
Perceived Characteristics
of Successful Family Practice Residency Maternity Care Training
Programs
Harry A. Taylor, MD; George H. Hansen, MD
Background and Objectives: This study determined
the perceived characteristics of family practice residency
training programs that produce a high percentage of graduates
who provide maternity care.
Methods: We surveyed a Delphi panel of
28 family practice maternity care experts.
Results: Consensus was reached after the
third survey. The characteristics of the family medicine faculty
and teaching service were rated as most important. Other essential
characteristics were an adequate obstetrical training volume;
mutual respect between obstetric and family medicine faculty
and residents; support for family practice maternity care
from obstetricians, administration, and nursing staff; and
family physicians being accepted in the community as maternity
care providers.
Conclusions: Family practice residency
programs that produce a high percentage of graduates who provide
maternity care have a unique, family practice maternity care-friendly
environment. Residency programs wishing to increase the percentage
of their graduates who provide maternity care should ensure
that their faculty support family practice maternity care,
are competent in maternity care, and model maternity care
in their own practices. They should strive to ensure an adequate
volume of obstetrical cases for resident education and work
toward educating patients and local obstetricians, nursing
staff, and hospital administration regarding family practice
maternity care.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):709-14.)
Combined Residency
Training in Family Practice and Other Specialties
Ron Chapman, MD, MPH; Jim Nuovo, MD
Background and Objectives: The University
of California, Davis residencies in family practice and psychiatry
are entering the third year of a combined training track.
Graduates of the combined program will be eligible for board
certification in both specialties. The combined program has
created opportunities for collaborative training with other
specialties, such as obstetrics and medical informatics. Barriers
and challenges to collaborative training include issues of
curriculum integration, establishment of an identity for residents
and future graduates, resident stress, acceptance of combined
programs, counting of generalist physicians, hospital privileges,
fulfillment of unmet societal needs, and improved collaboration
at academic health centers.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):715-8.)
|
| |
A Curriculum for
Multicultural Education in Family Medicine
Kathleen A. Culhane-Pera, MD, MA; Chris Reif,
MD, MPH; Eric Egli, PhD; Nancy J. Baker, MD; Rosanne Kassekert,
MSW, LICSW
Background and Objectives: To deliver effective
medical care to patients from all cultural backgrounds, family
physicians need to be culturally sensitive and culturally
competent. Our department implemented and evaluated a 3-year
curriculum to increase residents' knowledge, skills, and attitudes
in multicultural medicine. Our three curricular goals were
to increase self-awareness about cultural influences on physicians,
increase awareness about cultural influences on patients,
and improve multicultural communication in clinical settings.
Curricular objectives were arranged into five levels of cultural
competence. Content was presented in didactic sessions, clinical
settings, and community medicine projects.
Methods and Results: Residents did self-assessments
at the beginning of the second year and at the end of the
third year of the curriculum about their achievement and their
level of cultural competence. Faculty's evaluations of residents'
levels of cultural competence correlated significantly with
the residents' final self-evaluations. Residents and faculty
rated the overall curriculum as 4.26 on a 5-point scale (with
5 as the highest rating).
Conclusions: SFamily practice residents'
cultural knowledge, cross-cultural communication skills, and
level of cultural competence increased significantly after
participating in a multicultural curriculum.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):719-23.)
A Hypothetical
Model of the Effect of Medical Education on Specialty Choice
Christina S. Randall, PhD; George R. Bergus,
MD; Janet A. Schlechte, MD; Gail McGuinness, MD; Charles W.
Mueller, PhD
Background and Objectives: Using the Theory
of Reasoned Action, we propose a model that diagrams medical
school characteristics known or hypothesized to influence
the process of specialty choice. The medical school characteristics
we consider are administrative support, special programs,
primary care funding, number and quality of primary care faculty,
faculty influence, primary care residencies, committee representation,
primary care environment, required time, and student contact.
This model provides explicit hypotheses to be tested in future
research on specialty choice.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):724-9.)
Factors Associated
With Primary Care Residents' Satisfaction With Their Training
Christina S. Randall, PhD; George R. Bergus,
MD; Janet A. Schlechte, MD; Gail McGuinness, MD; Charles W.
Mueller, PhD
Background and Objectives: Satisfaction
is known to impact work performance, learning, recruitment,
and retention. This study identifies the factors associated
with primary care residents' satisfaction with their training.
Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey
based on the Price-Mueller model of job satisfaction. The
model included 14 job characteristics, four personal characteristics,
and four demographic factors. Data were collected in February
and March 1996 from residents in three primary care training
programs (family practice, pediatrics, and internal medicine)
at a large academic medical center. The same standardized,
self-administered questionnaires were used in all three departments.
Results: Seventy-five percent (n=119) of
the residents returned questionnaires. Five job characteristics
were positively associated with resident satisfaction: continuity
of care, autonomy, collegiality, work that encourages professional
growth, and work group loyalty. Role conflict, a sixth job
characteristic, was negatively associated with satisfaction.
The personal characteristic of having an optimistic outlook
on life was also positively associated with satisfaction.
The model explained 66% of the variation in self-reported
satisfaction.
Conclusions: The satisfaction of the residents
was significantly associated with six job characteristics
and one personal factor. Interventions based on these job
characteristics may increase resident satisfaction and may
lead to better patient outcomes, better work performance,
greater patient satisfaction, and more success in recruiting
top students into a residency.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):730-5.)
|
| |
Assessing Prenatal
Care in a Family Practice Residency Clinic
Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH; Robert M. Saywell,
Jr, PhD, MPH; Olas A. Hubbs III, MHA; Mary Beth Lodato, MSN;
Gregory Hindahl, MD; Gaylen M. Kelton, MD
Background and Objectives: This study demonstrates
how one family practice residency clinic characterized obstetric
clinic patients and assessed obstetric care using birth certificate
data (demographic characteristics and risk factors) and birth
outcome indicators.
Methods: We compared clinical characteristics
and birth outcomes for 901 patients who were delivered by
family physicians from the family practice residency clinic
with a matched and unmatched group of patients who were delivered
by other physicians in the county during 1990-1993.
Results: The study clinic patients were
at higher risk and had lower use of prenatal care. However,
the outcomes of the study clinic patients were significantly
better (fewer labor and delivery complications, procedures,
Cesarean deliveries, abnormal conditions of newborn, low birth
weight deliveries, and preterm birth) or no different from
the comparison group of non-clinic patients.
Conclusions: The analysis of birth certificate
data provided a favorable assessment of prenatal care provided
by a family practice residency clinic. This type of analysis
permits comparisons of birth outcomes with other local or
regional providers, statewide providers, and the year 2000
national objectives established by the National Center for
Health Statistics.
Clinical Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1997;29(10):736-42.)
|
|
|
|
| | |
{Text} |