Entry of US Medical School Graduates Into Family
Practice Residencies: 1997–1998 and 3-year Summary
Norman B. Kahn, Jr, MD; Gordon T. Schmittling,
MS; Julea G. Garner, MD; Robert Graham, MD
This is the 17th report prepared by the American Academy
of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical
school’s graduates entering family practice residency programs.
Approximately 16.6% of the 15,894 graduates of US medical
schools between July 1996 and June 1997 were first-year family
practice residents in October 1997, compared with 15.9% in
1996 and 14.6% in 1995. This is the highest percentage since
this series of studies began in 1980–1981 (12.8%). Medical
school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were
almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents
in October 1997 than were residents from privately funded
schools, 19.8% compared with 11.8%. The Mountain region reported
the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were
first-year residents in family practice programs in October
1997 at 25.8%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions
reported the lowest percentages at 11.7% and 10.7%, respectively.
Nearly half of the medical school graduates (48.1%) entering
a family practice residency program as first-year residents
in October 1997 entered a program in the same state where
they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each
medical school have varied substantially from year to year
since the AAFP began reporting this information. This article
reports the average percentage for each medical school for
the last 3 years. Also reported are the number and percentage
of graduates of colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited
family practice residency programs, based on estimates provided
by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.
Special Articles: 1998 Match
Results
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):554-63.)
Results of the 1998 National Resident Matching Program: Family
Practice
Norman B. Kahn, Jr, MD; Julea G. Garner, MD; Gordon
T. Schmittling, MS; Daniel J. Ostergaard, MD; Robert Graham,
MD
The 1998 National Resident Matching Program
(NRMP) results reflect a change in the perceptions and choices
of physicians entering graduate medical education in the United
States. Ninety-one fewer positions were filled in family practice
residency programs in 1998, as well as 21 fewer in primary
care internal medicine, 12 fewer in primary care pediatrics,
and 13 fewer in internal medicine-pediatric programs. In contrast,
49 more positions were filled in anesthesiology, and 12 more
US seniors chose diagnostic radiology, two “marker” disciplines
that have recently been market sensitive. Thirty-four more
positions were also filled in each of categorical internal
medicine and pediatrics programs, where trainees are “pluripotential”
with perceived options for practicing as generalists or entering
subspecialty fellowships, depending on the market. While the
demands of managed care and the needs of rural and underserved
populations continue to offer a market for family physicians,
family practice may have experienced a “primary care backlash”
though the 1998 NRMP.
Special Articles:
1998 Match Results
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):564-70.)
Family Practice
Night-call Frequency: 1981–1997
Dana E. King, MD; Lars Larsen, MD; Amy
M. Shende, MA
Background: Night
call has both service and educational value. This study examined
trends in night-call frequency from 1981–1997. Our hypothesis
was that night-call frequency is decreasing in family practice
residency programs.
Methods: We
reviewed the Directory of Family Practice Residency Programs
from 1981, 1989, and 1997 and entered into a database information
about call frequency from all of the programs in each year.
In-house night-call frequency and frequency of home call requiring
other trips to the hospital were combined to determine total
calls per year.
Results: The mean number of
total calls for PGY-1 residents was 190, 124, and 104 for
each cohort year, respectively (1981, 1989, 1997). PGY-2 total
calls were 160, 96, and 74. PGY-3 total calls were 151, 73,
and 57. For all years of residency, total calls in 1997 were
fewer than for 1981 and 1989.
Conclusions: Family
practice residents have less night call now than in 1981 or
1989. The educational consequences of decreasing night call
should be evaluated.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):571-3.)
Family Practice in
the New South Africa
Robert L. Williams, MD, MPH; Stephen
J. Reid, MBChB, MFamMed
Remarkable changes are taking place in the
new South Africa. Planned changes in the health care arena
present the new, relatively small discipline of family practice
with great opportunity for development and growth. With established
generalist roots and recent formal recognition in South Africa,
family practice should be well suited for a lead role in the
government’s efforts to extend health care access to those
denied it under apartheid. Whether family practice moves into
that role will depend on whether as a discipline it can project
a vision of how it can meet the country’s health care needs.
Close examination of family practice in South Africa shows
how the field reflects many of the societal problems of the
past and the challenges of the future. With a clear vision
of its role in the new South Africa, family practice could
overcome these challenges, as well as answer a broader question
about the place of family practice outside of the first world
setting.
International Family Medicine
(Fam Med 1998;30(7):574-8.)
Graphical Methods
for Detecting Bias
in Meta-analysis
Robert L. Ferrer, MD, MPH
The trustworthiness of meta-analysis, a set
of techniques used to quantitatively combine results from
different studies, has recently been questioned. Problems
with meta-analysis stem from bias in selecting studies to
include in a meta-analysis and from combining study results
when it is inappropriate to do so. Simple graphical techniques
address these problems but are infrequently applied. Funnel
plots display the relationship of effect size versus sample
size and help determine whether there is likely to have been
selection bias in including studies in the meta-analysis.
The L’Abbé plot displays the outcomes in both the treatment
and control groups of included studies and helps to decide
whether the studies are too heterogeneous to appropriately
combine into a single measure of effect.
Research Series
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):579-83.)
A Closer Look
at Confounding
Jeffrey Sonis, MD, MPH
Background and Objectives:
Confounding is one of the most common and important biases
in primary care research. This article explains the genesis
and effects of two common misconceptions of confounding: 1)
Confounding can be assessed with a statistical test. 2) All
covariates should be included in a multivariate model to control
confounding. Assessment of confounding by testing the statistical
significance of baseline differences or the significance of
a potential confounding factor in a multivariate model can
produce underestimates or overestimates of the true association
between an exposure and an outcome. Inclusion of all covariates
in a multivariate model may lead to controlling for variables
that are not, in fact, confounders. This may produce underestimates
or overestimates of the effect in question, as well as artificially
widened confidence intervals. Both of these misconceptions
can lead to profound misinterpretation of research results.
To prevent problems resulting from these misunderstandings,
researchers should consider drawing causal models prior to
conducting the research and use the change-in-estimate criterion,
rather than a statistical test, to detect confounding.
Research Series
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):584-8.)
The Family Physician:
What Sort of Person?
Howard Brody, MD, PhD
Background: Character and
virtue are as important as knowledge and skills in describing
the ideal family physician. Sir Luke Fildes’ The Doctor, a
widely reproduced painting, provides a visual icon that helps
focus attention on important aspects of the character of a
“healing sort of person.” By stressing rules and principles
to the detriment of a good life as a biographical or narrative
whole, modern teaching of medical ethics may fail to sufficiently
address this aspect of humanism in medicine. Three virtues
or character traits that seem necessary for the ideal family
physician are humility, compassion, and forgiveness. Such
evidence as now exists supports the idea that these physician
attributes might be linked to superior health outcomes.
Commentary
(Fam Med 1998;30(8):589-93.)
|