John P. Langlois, MD; Sarah Thach, MPH
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):232-4.)
Most of the time, teaching is a rewarding experience—teaching
learners keeps you on your toes, and watching learners develop
knowledge and skills is gratifying. Occasionally, however, problems
with learners can arise. For example, a learner may appear to
have a deficit of knowledge, may not exhibit appropriate behavior
for your office setting, or may seem to have personal issues
adversely affecting his or her clinical performance. Some excellent
preceptors have burned out and stopped teaching after a difficult
interaction with a learner. How can these difficult learning
situations be prevented?
The old adage, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of
cure” is as true in clinical teaching as it is in clinical medicine.
It is generally much more efficient (and pleasant) to prevent
a problem than to manage the negative impact once it has occurred.
In medicine and in clinical education, there are three levels
of prevention: primary, secondary, and tertiary. In primary
prevention, the goal is to keep the problem from occurring.
Secondary prevention is the early detection of an issue and
decisive action to minimize or eliminate the effects. Tertiary
prevention is the management of an existing problem to minimize
its negative impact. Each level of prevention has its own characteristics
and strengths (Table 1).
Primary Prevention
The prevention of problems before they occur is ideal. To help
prevent difficult teacher/learner interactions, it is critical
to communicate expectations—those that the school or program
has for the experience, the learner’s expectations for the rotation,
and your expectations for the learner’s role and behavior during
the time you are working together.
As the preceptor, you should know the school’s expectations
for the learning experience. Some programs allow the preceptor
a large degree of latitude in structuring the rotation. Others
may have extremely specific learning objectives. You should
know the specific expectations before agreeing to teach the
rotation and then review them with the learner at the beginning
of the rotation.
A detailed orientation for the learner is critical and should
include your specific expectations to him or her. What time
does he or she need to arrive? What are the night call and weekend
expectations? What format do you prefer for notes and presentations?
What is your dress code? These and other issues of value to
you should be specifically addressed with the learner from the
beginning. A clear understanding of your expectations and goals
can help the learner adapt to your environment and avoid significant
problems.
Learners also bring their own expectations to a rotation or
learning experience. They may expect a certain level of responsibility
or be counting on clinical experiences that are not available
in your practice situation. Detecting any mismatches early can
allow you to inform learners or negotiate options before problems
develop. By the same token, knowing the learners’ individual
desires, goals, and expectations will help you make their rotations
more successful experiences for them.
Even if a good orientation and discussion occur at the beginning
of the rotation, new or unanticipated issues can develop once
the rotation is underway. A formal opportunity to sit down together
halfway through the rotation creates an opportunity to reassess
and refine goals and expectations for both the preceptor and
the learner and can set the stage for an even smoother second
half of the experience.
Secondary Prevention
If primary prevention strategies have not succeeded, early detection
of problems and intervention is essential. Just as early detection
is key in the management of medical problems, it is crucial
in the effective management of difficult teacher-learner interactions.
Even if an educational problem cannot be eliminated, early detection
can help minimize the negative impact on you, your staff, your
patients, and the learner.
Secondary prevention depends on maintaining an awareness that
things can go wrong. Community-based teachers of health professionals
are often optimists in dealing with their learners. They have
come to expect high-quality learners with whom they are able
to interact in a positive and pleasant way. As a result, early
warning signs of difficult interactions are often ignored, downplayed,
or attributed to a bad day or other circumstances. It is crucial
for the teacher to pay close attention to these hunches or feelings
that things may not be quite right. Additional clues can come
from the comments or opinions of staff or partners. Every red
flag (or even yellow flag!) should be evaluated, just as attention
should be paid to every abnormal Pap smear. Not all will reveal
an underlying serious problem, but serious problems can be missed
if these warning signs are not viewed as potential indicators
of significant issues.
Do not use the wait-and-see approach as the only way to manage
potential issues. A delay of 1 week may lead to further delay,
and, before long, the problem has grown, or it is near the end
of the experience, and there is not time to intervene. In the
community educational setting, the preceptor must examine and
address potential issues as early as possible due to the limited
time of contact. Plan to institute an organized assessment of
a potential problem situation early. (A future column will address
“Managing the Difficult Learning Situation.”) The earlier the
preceptor begins looking critically at the situation, the more
likely it is that an intervention will succeed. Not all situations
require an immediate full assessment. When a problem appears
minor, the preceptor can give the learner specific feedback
on the issue and then watch carefully to see whether that feedback
is acted on. The following example may illustrate this:
A third-year medical student is beginning a clerkship in your
office. During the first week you have noted that the learner
takes a much longer time to evaluate patients than previous
students have taken. It is early in the third year, and the
student has had one clinical experience in the hospital setting
only. You arrange a feedback session where you review the learner’s
performance with specific examples and give specific suggestions
and instruction in time management with patients. You then closely
monitor the learner’s performance for the next 2 days.
|
Table 1
|
|
Preventing Learning Problems
|
|
PREVENTION
|
Primary—Prevent the problem
before it occurs.
• Know the course expectations.
• Orient the learner well.
• Set clear expectations and goals.
• Determine the learner’s goals and expectations.
• Reassess midway in the course. |
Secondary—Early detection
• Pay attention to your hunches/clues.
• Don’t wait.
• Give specific feedback early and monitor closely. |
Tertiary—Manage a problem to
minimize impact.
• If it ain’t workin’. . . SEEK HELP.
• Don’t be a martyr.
• Do not give a passing grade to a learner who has not earned
it. |
The above is a screening test. You have identified
a problem behavior and have made a simple intervention to determine
if this problem exists. The key step is the follow-up: monitoring
closely for a limited time. If there is no longer a problem,
then only continued monitoring is needed. If the problem behavior
continues, a careful assessment needs to be made as soon as
possible. Note that this is quite a different strategy from
the wait-and-see strategy; a brief active intervention is made,
and a brief period of close observation follows. The chance
of problem issues slipping through undetected is minimized.
The judicious use of quality feedback and close follow-up is
invaluable.
Tertiary Prevention
Sometimes a significant problem can arise despite the best efforts
and intentions of the preceptor and the school. Preceptors often
see having a problem during a rotation as a personal defeat
or failure. Nothing could be further from the truth. Course
directors know that there will be an occasional difficult situation
and are prepared to assist preceptors. Seek help early, and
discuss your concerns with someone who will understand.
Avoid the temptation to say, “Well, I’ll just stick this out.
There are only a couple of weeks left.” This does nothing to
alleviate the negative impact of the problem on you, your staff,
and patients, and it does not help the learner. If you have
been trying the tricks and techniques that you know and are
still not making any headway, then it is time to get help.
It is important not to give a passing grade if you do not
feel the learner has earned it. One of the characteristics of
a profession and a professional is self-governance. Preceptors
have a duty to address important concerns and keep from passing
along learners who may not serve the profession well. Calling
the course director notifies the program of your concerns and
can help you determine an appropriate course of action. Some
grade choices, such as “low pass” or “incomplete,” will require
follow-up of educational issues or concerns by the program or
school. Give the grade that is earned so that the learner’s
performance and abilities are accurately reflected.
Prevention: A Summary
Many potentially difficult situations can be prevented by setting
expectations, giving feedback, and providing thoughtful, ongoing
evaluation. Other issues can be detected early by being alert
for, and paying attention to, hunches and clues that may indicate
a subtle or developing issue. At times, despite everyone’s best
intentions, a significant problem may occur, and help is required.
Attention to all levels of prevention in clinical education
can improve the experience for both learner and preceptor.
Corresponding Author: Address correspondence
to Dr Langlois, MAHEC Family Practice Residency, 118 W.T. Weaver
Boulevard, Asheville, NC 28804. 828-258-0670. Fax: 828-257-4738.
E-mail: johnl@mtn.ncahec.org.