|
Challenges
to Academic Family Medicine in the Current Health Care
Environment
William
J. Hueston, MD; Arch G. Mainous III, PhD; Carol Bazell,
MD; Margaret Kelsey Connor, MPH
Background:
Changes in health care delivery and funding have
placed strains on academic medical centers’ ability
to meet their multiple missions. To gain insight into
how this new academic landscape is affecting academic
primary care, this study examined the current status
and perceived challenges at nine departments of family
medicine at allopathic and osteopathic medical schools.
Methods:
Site visits were made to nine academic departments of
family medicine where key informant interviews were
conducted with several individuals in key leadership
positions. Sites were chosen to maximize diversity among
departments along a variety of factors, such as location,
size, mission, and type of school (private versus public).
Interviews were transcribed and analyzed by a three-person
multidisciplinary team for key themes.
Results:
Analysis of interviews revealed five major challenges
for academic departments of family medicine: 1) adjusting
to new clinical demands in the academic health center,
2) organizing and administering new initiatives in community-based
education, 3) recruiting and retaining faculty, 4) developing
and maintaining research capacity, and 5) serving multiple
missions (education, clinical care, and academic pursuits)
in times of financial restraint.
Conclusions: Significant challenges face academic
departments of family medicine. The success or failure
of departments of family medicine to meet these challenges
could serve as a bellwether for how primary care fits
into the future overall scheme of academic health centers.
Special
Article
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):240-5.)
Long-term Effects of a Primary Health
Care Intervention Program for Women: Lower Blood Pressure
and Stable Weight
Cecilia Björkelund, MD, PhD; Lauren Lissner, PhD;
Carol Devine, PhD; Anna Karin Lindroos, PhD; Lis Palm,
RD; Anna Westerståhl, MD
Background:
In Strömstad, with 10,000 inhabitants, a cardiovascular
prevention program was launched during 1985–1987 because
of high rates of cardiovascular disease. To study long-term
effects in women, an 8-year follow-up was conducted.
Methods:
Participants (n=114) and nonparticipants (n=269) in
the lifestyle intervention program in 1985–1987 (both
groups with cardiovascular risk factors) were compared
regarding risk factor levels after 8 years. Effects
were also compared to another community not exposed
to intervention.
Results:
After 8 years, intervention participants showed significant
reduction of mean systolic blood pressure compared to
the control group and had higher intake of dietary fibers
and more-positive attitudes to and better knowledge
of healthy diets. There was no increase of mean body
weight or serum triglyceride levels whatsoever in the
intervention group. Compared with another female population
not exposed to intervention, body weight and systolic
blood pressure changed in a significantly more favorable
way.
Conclusions:
Results from the prevention program could be discerned
after 8 years. Advantages in risk factor changes could
also be found when comparing with another female population.
Given the high level of stroke in women within the community,
the blood pressure advantage in the intervention group
is particularly encouraging.
Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1999 Annual Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):246-51.)
Prevalence of the
Use of Herbal Products in a Low-income Population
Margaret
Planta, MD; Berit Gundersen, PharmD; John C. Petitt,
MD
Objectives:
This study determined the prevalence of herb/supplement
use in a low-income population and determined the providers’
level of knowledge about herbs/supplements.
Methods:
Adult English-speaking patients seen at a rural family
practice residency clinic were offered an anonymous
survey. Another survey was developed for the clinic
providers. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test.
Results: Fifty-six percent of a low-income population
use herbs/supplements; 41% of all users cited friends
or relatives as their main source of information, and
53% of users had not informed their provider. In the
provider survey, 69% of the providers indicated that
they had received no education about herbs/supplements,
yet 71% were asked about them by patients at least twice
a month.
Conclusions:
Because herb/supplement use occurs across all demographic
groups, all patients should be questioned about their
use of such substances. Currently, few providers are
prepared to guide their patients about herbs/supplements.
Efforts should be made to educate health care providers
about common herbs/supplements.
Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1999 Annual Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):252-7.)
Recruitment
Behavior and Program Directors: How Ethical Are Their
Perspectives About the Match Process?
Peter J. Carek, MD, MS; Kimberly D. Anderson,
PhD; Amy V. Blue, PhD; Brian E. Mavis, PhD
Objective:
This study examined family practice residency directors’
perspectives on the 1999 National Resident Matching
Program (NRMP) process and identified directors’ expectations
for students’ recruitment behavior.
Methods: Subjects were the family practice residency
program directors. A 22-item written questionnaire was
mailed to each director. The questions related to the
directors’ perceptions of the following issues: applicants
interviewing in more than one specialty, communication
initiated by programs or applicants, commitments made
to applicants and by applicants, ethical dilemmas faced
by the program director, and the NRMP process itself.
Descriptive statistics were reported.
Results:
Only a few of the residency program directors (9.1%)
felt that it was ethically wrong for an applicant to
interview in more than one specialty. However, most
program directors (83%) indicated that the knowledge
of an applicant interviewing in more than one specialty
had a “significant” negative or “some” negative effect
on the applicant’s rank order. Ninety-five percent of
program directors indicated that they engage in follow-up
communication with applicants following the formal interview.
Almost all program directors (98%) reported that at
least some applicants contact them following the formal
interview to inform them that the program was a “high”
or No. 1 rank-order choice. The majority of program
directors (94%) felt that the NRMP process placed their
program in the position of having to be dishonest with
applicants to match their top choices.
Conclusions:
The results of the study indicate that the actions of
many program directors and applicants may not be consistent
with the written policies of the NRMP.
Residency
Education
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):258-60.)
A Comparison of Resident and Faculty
Attitudes Toward Physician-assisted Suicide and Active
Voluntary Euthanasia
Bruce Bushwick, MD; David Emrhein, MEd; Kristi Peters,
MS
Purpose:
Assisted death practices such as physician-assisted
suicide (PAS) and active voluntary euthanasia (AVE)
are becoming more acceptable to the public and the medical
profession. This study compared the attitudes and practices
of resident house staff physicians with the medical
staff physicians responsible for teaching them regarding
PAS and AVE.
Methods:
A convenience sample of 372 medical staff and 105 resident
house staff from a multi-residency community teaching
hospital were anonymously surveyed. The overall response
rate was 47%. The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions
that examined the subjects’ professional and legal values,
willingness to participate in assisted death practices,
and personal preferences for assisted death practices.
Results: The resident house staff differed significantly
from the medical staff in attitudes toward assisted
death practices. The resident house staff was less likely
to support the traditional prohibitions against PAS
and AVE. The resident house staff was also more likely
to offer assisted death practices if they were legal.
There was no significant difference, however, in the
participation of assisted death practices between the
groups respectively for PAS and AVE. The residents were
more likely to request PAS or AVE for themselves or
family members.
Conclusions: There are significant differences in
attitudes and practices between resident physicians
and medical staff physicians concerning PAS and AVE.
These differences could lead to professional conflicts
when setting clinical goals for end-of-life care and
could compromise patient care.
Residency
Education
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):261-6.)
Applied Medical Informatics and Computing
Skills of Students, Residents, and Faculty
Anthony F. Jerant, MD; Andree J. Lloyd, PhD
Background
and Objectives: Little is known regarding the applied
medical informatics and computing skills of family practice
residents and faculty, yet such information is critical
when planning a medical informatics curriculum. We conducted
a survey at our institution to collect this information.
Methods:
An applied medical informatics and computing skills
survey was administered to 93 first-year medical students,
42 family practice residents, and 14 family medicine
faculty. Responses were compared between groups before
and after stratification by age and gender.
Results: A total of 92% of students, 100% of residents,
and 79% of faculty responded. Faculty had the highest
rate of computer ownership (91%), followed by students
(86%) and family practice residents (79%). Students
and interns had the highest overall confidence using
computers, followed by faculty and then senior residents.
Faculty, students, and junior residents were significantly
more confident than senior residents in their ability
to perform several specific tasks, such as conducting
a MEDLINE search. Residents perceived lack of money
and time as barriers to improving their skills.
Conclusions:
Current senior residents may require remedial training
to graduate with the computer skills specified in curricular
guidelines. While upcoming medical students and interns
will demand more advanced training, faculty may not
have the skills to provide it.
Medical
Informatics
(Fam
Med 2000;32(4):267-72.)
Core Curriculum
Guidelines: Minimum Standards, Practical Goals, or Lofty
Ideals?
William M. Chop, Jr, MD
Background:
Increasing numbers of immigrants from the former Soviet
Union (FSU) are coming to the United States. Educated
and resilient, this population has many ethnic origins,
but all have shared a common experience under the Soviet
system and the deterioration of health care since the
collapse of the Soviet Union. An ethnomedical approach
was used to review published work and integrate material
obtained in interviews with physicians in the FSU. Information
is organized into concepts of causality, therapists,
and forms of therapy. FSU medicine incorporates many
Western treatments but also uses natural and spa remedies.
Mainstream FSU physicians make diagnoses and use therapies
that are unknown in the West. In addition, the active
traditions of folk medicine and magical curing persist.
US health care practitioners need to go to extra lengths
to understand the perspectives and experiences of these
patients and must explain basic concepts of health care
in this country that will be new. An open approach to
the patients’ non-Western beliefs and remedies will
support a successful patient-practitioner interaction.
Essays
and Commentaries
(Fam Med 2000;32(4):273-4.)
|