|
For the Office-based Teacher of Family Medicine
February 2000, Vol. 32, No. 2
Paul M. Paulman, MD
Feature Editor
Editor’s Note: In this column, Samuel LeBaron, MD, PhD, and
Erika Schillinger, MD, outline a strategy for improving student
education and patient interaction in the office. Drs LeBaron
and Schillinger are faculty of the Department of Family Medicine
at Stanford University.
I welcome your comments about this feature, which is also published
on the STFM Web site at . I also encourage all
predoctoral directors to make copies of this feature and distribute
it to their preceptors (with the appropriate Family Medicine citation).
Send your submissions to Paul Paulman, MD, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, 983075 Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3075. 402-559-6818. Fax: 402-559-6501.
E-mail: ppaulman@unmc.edu.
Submissions should be no longer than 3–4 double-spaced pages.
References can be used but are not required. Count each table
or figure as one page of text.
Including the Patient in
Student Presentations
Samuel LeBaron, MD, PhD; Erika Schillinger, MD
(Fam Med 2000;32(2):87-8.)
The opportunity for students to take a patient’s history independently
and present the patient to their preceptor benefits the student,
the preceptor, and the patient. When your student is ready to
present the patient to you, consider the advantages of doing
this in the exam room in the patient’s presence. This article
highlights some advantages of including the patient in the student
presentation and describes some techniques to facilitate this
format.
Advantages of Presenting the History and Physical in Front
of the Patient
There are significant advantages to including the patient in
the student presentation.
1) Time Saving
This format usually saves time because the preceptor doesn’t
need to confirm or repeat the history. The entire history can
be confirmed or corrected by the patient as the student is recounting
it.
2) Improved Accuracy
The patient may correct inaccuracies in the history or add additional
points that may have been omitted.
3) Improved Student Education
This process is a valuable learning opportunity for the student
and provides instant feedback about his/her ability to listen
and summarize the history accurately. This process is also a
good way for the preceptor to assess the student’s skill at
establishing patient rapport. While seeing students in action
is valuable to the preceptor, the reciprocal is equally true.
When students see their preceptors teaching patients, they may
learn to emulate their preceptors as physician educators.
4) Improved Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction is improved when patients are not left
waiting alone in the exam room, possibly feeling abandoned,
while decisions are being made about their care. The patients
feel included as active participants in the discussion, rather
than as passive recipients of treatment. When the preceptor
and student discuss their differential diagnosis and options
for treatment openly in front of their patients—and with the
invitation for their participation—patients often comment on
how much they enjoy “getting inside the doctor’s head” as they
listen to the thought process. Many patients also comment that
they feel proud knowing that they are contributing to the development
and training of physicians. While the students learn, so do
the patients, who, with added insight into their particular
disease processes, are more likely to adhere to their treatment
regimens.
Exceptions
Some patients present difficult challenges that are best discussed
initially in the preceptor’s private office before going into
the exam room. Examples include patients who are angry, depressed,
grieving, or who have come primarily to discuss complex management
issues, such as end-of-life care or a chronic condition.
Students need to be told at the beginning of the rotation that
when they encounter such patients, they (and the patients) will
usually find it preferable to bring the preceptor into the room
as soon as possible.
In such a case, the student may give a brief summary of the
circumstances outside of the exam room, and the preceptor and
student can then decide how to proceed. In many cases, it will
be simpler and more effective for the student to simply observe
the remainder of the visit. Occasionally, however, a sensitive
and astute student will already have obtained a significant
amount of history. In that situation, a few moments outside
the room may be helpful to suggest ways for the student to proceed
in the most sensitive manner possible.
When the patient does not speak English well, and the preceptor
and/or student are not fluent in the patient’s language, there
may be a strong inclination to conduct the patient presentation
outside the exam room because of a fear of being rude. However,
even though the patient may not understand the words, nonverbal
behavior still conveys strong messages. Thus, it may be quite
meaningful for the patient to simply watch the preceptor and
student interact, with an occasional synopsis in the patient’s
language of what has been discussed.
Skills
Many students need some preparation to help them maximize the
value of presenting in front of the patient.
1) Speak in Real English
Students need to be reminded not to speak in medical jargon
when discussing a patient’s medical problems in front of the
patient. This is an important and sometimes challenging frame
shift for students who have been rotating through inpatient
wards and who have worked hard on learning to speak in abbreviations
and acronyms.
2) Invite Patient Participation
Patient participation is especially important as a means of
correcting, clarifying, or adding to the history obtained by
the student. This opportunity to improve the quality of the
history is usually felt to be satisfying to both the student
and patient. One simple, direct invitation would be for the
student to say to the patient, “As I tell the doctor what you
have told me, please feel free to correct or add to anything
I say, to make sure I’m as accurate as possible.”
3) Use Eye Contact
Remind students to make eye contact at intervals during the
presentation. In your role as preceptor, you can model this
by looking back and forth between the student and patient during
the visit. This acknowledges the patient’s presence and shows
an interest in his/her reactions. Patients who do not speak
English are often reassured by eye contact, supplemented by
a smile and a touch on the patient’s shoulder.
4) Take Control
Ask the student to lead the conversation with the patient. Patients
will often interject comments that are directed at the preceptor.
It is important for the preceptor not to step in and take over
but rather to let the student resume control of the situation
by continuing with his/her presentation. The student needs to
know that this is your expectation.
5) Treat the Student Like a Colleague as Much as Possible
Some students are understandably reluctant to present in front
of a patient when they worry that the preceptor may embarrass
them by asking difficult questions or by ignoring the student
for the remainder of the visit. Continue to keep the student
involved through an ongoing exchange that is collegial, not
condescending. It is especially helpful to invite the student
to formulate an initial assessment and plan. If you disagree
with the student’s conclusion, acknowledge the ideas with respect,
while offering your own perspective. If the student is obviously
uncertain about how to proceed, there is no need to put him/her
on the spot. Instead, you could offer your own ideas and ask
the student if that seems reasonable.
Many patients comment that they feel closer to their physician
and more confident that their care is of high quality when they
are included actively in the teaching of a student doctor. This
is a strategy that, in most cases, will be of benefit to all.
Corresponding Author: Address correspondence
to Dr LeBaron, Stanford University, Department of Family Medicine,
703 Welch Road, Suite G-1, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1708. 650-725-5339.
Fax: 650-723-9692. E-mail: slebaron@
leland.stanford.edu.
|