October 2000, Vol. 32, No. 9
Paul M. Paulman, MD, Feature Editor
Editor’s Note: In this second of a two-part series on
difficult learning situations, John Langlois, MD, and Sarah Thach,
MPH, of the Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC) Division
of Family Medicine in Asheville, NC, provide us with information
and tips on managing difficult learning situations. The content
of the column is based on materials developed as a part of the
Preceptor Development Program (PDP), a comprehensive program of
preceptor development materials supported by a Health Resources
and Services Administration Family Medicine Training Grant (1D15PE50119-01).
Detailed information on this project can be obtained from the
PDP Web site at www.mtn.ncahec.org/pdp.
I welcome your comments about this feature, which is also published
on the STFM Web site at www.stfm.org. I also encourage all predoctoral
directors to make copies of this feature and distribute it to
their preceptors (with the appropriate Family Medicine citation).
Send your submissions to Paul Paulman, MD, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, 983075 Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3075. 402-559-6818. Fax: 402-559-6501.
E-mail: ppaulman@unmc.edu.
Submissions should be no longer than 3–4 double-spaced pages.
References can be used but are not required. Count each table
or figure as one page of text.
Mini-ethnography: Meaningful Exploration Made Easy
Jamie Weinstein, MD; William Ventres, MD
Students in their third year of medical school spend the majority
of their time on hospital services mired in the minutiae of problem
lists, differential diagnoses, and inpatient management. They
are often completely out of touch not only with ambulatory practice
but also with community life outside the hospital. Family medicine
clerkships can remediate this situation by offering both exposure
to outpatient medicine and a unique opportunity for broader educational
experiences.
Many authors have suggested population-based projects, chart
reviews, or independent learning modules as possibilities for
enhancing a family medicine rotation.1 In this article, we present
an alternative for actively engaging students in learning about
the intersection of community and individual health: the mini-ethnography.
Ethnography is a process of learning from people about various
aspects of their lives. As such, it fits nicely with the view
of family medicine as a “human science.” The core principles of
ethnography involve defining a question, interviewing informants,
becoming a participant observer in a community, analyzing one’s
observations, and presenting results.2 The term mini suggests
that it is doable in 6 weeks, allowing 1 day per week for the
project.
To demonstrate the use of mini-ethnography, we present the following
example in which a student investigated attitudes and communication
about breast-feeding during a family medicine clerkship at a busy
urban clinic (Table 1). After conducting a brief literature review—including
three articles that illustrate the use of ethnography within medical
contexts2-4—the student developed a general question and then
identified and interviewed key informants. The audiotaped interviews
followed a specific format. They began with a general statement
about the project and an open-ended question to prompt the informant’s
story. For approximately 30 minutes, the student actively listened
to the narrative, using appropriate open-ended prompts (ie, “Tell
me more about that”). Themes that emerged were identified. In
the next half hour, the student asked increasingly specific questions
about three or four of the most interesting themes. Immediately
afterward, the student spent 1 hour reviewing the audiotape to
recall information and quotations supporting the themes. The most
interesting themes were listed and compared, and areas for further
discussion were developed.
| Table 1 |
|
Example of Mini-Ethnography
|
| Project question |
How do health care practitioners
affect women’s decision-making process about breast-feeding? |
| Literature review
|
On the methodology
of ethnography: three articles (references 2–4). On breast-feeding
practices: four to five articles from the medical literature |
| Identified informants |
Family physician, family nurse
practitioner, community health nurse, lactation consultant,
prenatal patient, nursing mothers |
| Initial interview question |
For practitioners: “Tell me about
breast-feeding in this community and how you play a part in
women’s choices to breast-feed.” For mothers: “Tell me about
your decision about how to feed your infant.” |
| Participant observation |
Student observed mothers and
infants in a lactation class, noted actual feeding behaviors,
and asked about breast-feeding. Student participated in prenatal
visits with family physician. |
| Themes generated/rank listed
by importance |
Difficulties/barriers to breast-feeding,
lactation services as preventive care, practitioner’s education
and personal experience listed by importance with breast-feeding,
practitioners’ views on cultural differences regarding breast-feeding,
use of support services, duration of breast-feeding and frequency |
| Examples of follow-up
questions |
Regarding theme of “difficulties/barriers
to breast-feeding:”
- “Why do you think women stop breast-feeding?”
- “Tell me more about the early difficulties
you experienced.”
- “What exactly were problems your baby
had with latching on?"
|
| Weekly discussions between student
and preceptor |
Data reviewed Questions explored:
Do the data make intuitive sense? Are the generated themes
consistent with the data observed? Progress of the project
evaluated |
| Major themes/illustrative
quotes |
- Difficulties/barriers to breast-feeding
“Early supplementation can be a real problem.” (family
physician)
- Use of lactation services as preventive
care “All women should have well breast-feeding checks.”
(community nurse)
- Practitioner’s education and personal
experience with breast-feeding “My personal experience
is helpful” (family nurse practitioner)
|
| Topics raised for further discussion
|
- How can we support women more effectively
immediately postpartum to establish nursing?
- What can we learn from cultural differences
in rates of breast-feeding?
- Should women receive well breast-feeding
checks?
|
Limited participant observation occurred during a hospital-based
lactation clinic. Weekly meetings provided a venue for the student
to discuss data and progress with the preceptor; at the end, the
student gave a lunchtime presentation to interested clinic personnel.
The project fit comfortably into a 6-week rotation, with preceptor
time commitment no more than 1 hour per week (Table 2). There
are potential limitations to the use of mini-ethnography as a
viable investigative methodology for medical students. Some students
may be inherently uncomfortable with its qualitative nature. Others
may have yet to gain confidence in their active listening skills.
As well, the project’s success relies to a degree on the availability
of interested and talkative informants.
| Table 2 |
|
Weekly Schedule
|
|
Week
1
|
Preceptor Tasks
Present mini-ethnography idea
|
Student Tasks
Understand Mini-ethnography |
Student Time
8 hours reading/reflection |
| Share articles: ethnography2, case example3,
and narrative4 |
Formulate initial research question |
1 hour (lunch with preceptor) |
|
2
|
Dicuss literature review |
Literature review |
8 hours |
| Identify key community resources/activities |
Schedule interviews/activities for participant
observation |
1 hour (lunch with preceptor) |
|
3-4
|
Continue to identify community resources |
Schedule appointments Interview informants |
12 hours/6 interviews(1 hour interview/1
hour review) |
| Review progress with interviews,, data analysis
|
Participant observation
Data collection |
4–8 hours for participant observation participant
observation
1 hour (lunch with preceptor) |
|
5
|
Review progress with data analysis |
Analyze data |
8 hours
1 hour (lunch with preceptor) |
|
6
|
Discuss project and process |
Prepare results
Present results |
8 hours
1 hour (lunch with preceptor) |
Doing mini-ethnography has many benefits. Because ethnography
is not hypothesis driven but, rather, observational and interactive,
it is an engaging format for a student to explore the process
of learning about a community. It allows students to develop their
communication skills and introduces them to process-oriented,
reflective medical practice. Because ethnography is qualitative
and not based on surveys or statistical analyses, a fulfilling
project can be completed in a reasonable time frame. For clinicians,
it can foster their own reflective practice and further their
insight into their communities. Having a student participate in
activities outside the office frees up the preceptor’s schedule
and helps balance the impact of having a student in a busy clinic.
Mini-ethnography can be used to explore a variety of topics.
Projects can be tailored to student interests (as our example
was) or be more generic in scope. Possibilities include studying
people’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding preventive
services, phone triage, or nursing home care. Projects can be
focused, such as examining how a certain ethnic group understands
a specific disease state or how the local emergency services work
(incorporating Saturday night ambulance rides for participant
observation). They can be general, as in simply having a student
use the process to get a sense about the community.
Regardless of the specific project, mini-ethnography can be tremendously
worthwhile and enriching for both medical student and community-based
teacher. We invite you to explore its use.
Corresponding Author: Address correspondence
to Dr Ventres, Providence-Southeast Family Medicine, 4104 SE 82nd
Avenue, Suite 250, Portland, OR 97266. 503-215-9850. Fax: 503-215-9855.
E-mail: bventres@providence.org.
References
1. DaRosa DA, Dunningham GL, Stearns J, Ferenchick G, Bowen J,
Simpson D. Ambulatory teaching “lite:” less clinic time, more
educationally fulfilling. Acad Med 1997;72: 358-61.
2. Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Ethnography: a stepwise approach for
primary care researchers. Fam Med 1996;28:52-6.
3. Miller W. Routine, ceremony, or drama: an exploratory field
study of the primary care clinical encounter. J Fam Pract 1992;34:289-95.
4. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B. Narrative-based medicine: why study
narrative? BMJ 1999; 318(7175):48-50.
|