Other Publications

Education Columns

Training to Heal: Designing Curriculum to Teach and Assess Empathy in Medical Education

By Nikette Neal, MD, Dr Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University

Healing is defined as the process of making or becoming sound or healthy again. Alleviate, ease, help, lessen, improve, resolve, correct, and restore are all accepted synonyms for this word. In medical education, we are charged with the task of teaching students how to “heal,” but are we indeed fulfilling this charge? The cultivation of empathy is a learning objective recommended by the Association of American Medical Colleges,1 yet thousands of students graduate from medical school every year thinking that their central focus is to cure physical ailments. This can produce physicians who practice in a way that corrects a problem without actually restoring the patient. An approach to patient care that focuses on the complaint but is without empathy is incomplete and does a disservice to both the patient and the physician. At the Dr Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine at Nova Southeastern University (NSU MD) we decided to construct our curriculum to put a central focus on the cultivation of empathy.

Physician empathy is on the decline. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, a validated questionnaire developed in an attempt to measure empathy among medical students, demonstrated a downward trend in empathy in medical students throughout medical school.2 It has been challenging to elucidate the cause of this decline due to difficulties in both defining and assessing empathy. Some suggest that this decline in empathy is largely due to the experience of an average American medical student, which includes “transient social relationships, hurried and fragmented patient-caregiver relationships, and avoidance of intimacy during medical training.”3 This would suggest that designing undergraduate medical education curricula that emphasize and demonstrate empathy may start to promote empathetic behaviors in medical students.  

In educating medical students, we often unintentionally teach that “fixing” a patient is our most important role as physicians. Students are encouraged to be right and exact in their treatment plan, without similar focus on empathy and thoughtfulness. Clinical skills are assessed without focus on their delivery and the patient experience. At NSU MD, we are dedicated to training physicians who provide high quality care that is both effective and empathetic. As a new medical school, we have the unique opportunity to design a curriculum that is innovative in its approach to teaching empathy. We have chosen to use our Practice of Medicine courses to expose our students to skills that go beyond the standard history and physical exam. Each NSU MD clinical skills faculty member takes part in faculty development specific to humanism in medicine. We have designed a clinical skills curriculum that encourages an approach to patient care that says, “How can I serve you?” instead of “How can I fix you?” This new curriculum supports a shift in focus from trying to assuage a physical ailment to trying to improve a patient’s overall quality of life. The students are assessed using a rubric that includes behavioral anchors allowing students to achieve higher scores based on the effort used to make a patient feel comfortable. For example, asking the patient how they would like to be addressed, encouraging the patient to tell their story without interruption, and forming a therapeutic alliance are all included in our assessment tools.

As part of our clinical skills course, students take part in an interactive activity called the Science of Clinical Practice (SCP). In these SCP sessions, students are asked to view a patient case from a different lens in order to help them to identify with the humanistic aspects of medicine; they then write a reflective essay. One example of this is our SCP on culinary medicine. In this session, the students assist a patient with hyperlipidemia in developing a healthy meal plan. For this, the students must consider that this person is of low socioeconomic status with a limited budget and difficulty with transportation. The objective of this activity is to teach students about food insecurity and dietary counseling while demonstrating the need to consider social aspects when counseling a patient. Chen, et al suggests that reflective writing in medical education had a positive correlation with improvement in student empathy.4 Involvement in projects dedicated to serving underserved populations also seem to have this positive effect on empathy, according to a 2014 study by Jones et al.5 For additional reinforcement, our students take part in an interprofessional service learning project collaborating with nurses and social workers to perform needs assessments for mothers and babies in underserved communities. Further down the line, we are looking forward to assessing our curriculum in relation to its impact on empathy

Fundamentally, the Dr Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine is dedicated to creating a culture that promotes seeing patients as humans and not as their diagnoses. In the words of Dr Edward Trudeau, the goals for our students should be “to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always.”

References

1. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Med Educ. 2002;36(6):522-527. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01234.x
2. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):934-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01911.x
3. Spencer J. Decline in empathy in medical education: how can we stop the rot? Med Educ. 2004;38(9):916-918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01965.x
4. Chen I, Forbes C. Reflective writing and its impact on empathy in medical education: systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014;11:20. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.20
5. Jones K, Blinkhorn LM, Schumann SA, Reddy ST. Promoting sustainable community service in the 4th year of medical school: a longitudinal service-learning elective. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):296-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.911698

Contact Us

11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway

Leawood, KS 66211

(800) 274-7928

stfmoffice@stfm.org 

 

 

Ask a Question
AI Chatbot Tips

Tips for Using STFM's AI Assistant

STFM's AI Assistant is designed to help you find information and answers about Family Medicine education. While it's a powerful tool, getting the best results depends on how you phrase your questions. Here's how to make the most of your interactions:

1. Avoid Ambiguous Language

Be Clear and Specific: Use precise terms and avoid vague words like "it" or "that" without clear references.

Example:

Instead of: "Can you help me with that?"
Try: "Can you help me update our Family Medicine clerkship curriculum?"
Why this is important: Ambiguous language can confuse the AI, leading to irrelevant or unclear responses. Clear references help the chatbot understand exactly what you're asking.

2. Use Specific Terms

Identify the Subject Clearly: Clearly state the subject or area you need information about.

Example:

Instead of: "What resources does STFM provide?"
Try: "I'm a new program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship. What STFM resources are available to help me design or update clerkship curricula?"
Why this is better: Providing details about your role ("program coordinator") and your goal ("design or update clerkship curricula") gives the chatbot enough context to offer more targeted information.

3. Don't Assume the AI Knows Everything

Provide Necessary Details:The STFM AI Assistant has been trained on STFM's business and resources. The AI can only use the information you provide or that it has been trained on.

Example:

Instead of: "How can I improve my program?"
Try: "As a program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship, what resources does STFM provide to help me improve student engagement and learning outcomes?"
Why this is important: Including relevant details helps the AI understand your specific situation, leading to more accurate and useful responses.

4. Reset if You Change Topics

Clear Chat History When Switching Topics:

If you move to a completely new topic and the chatbot doesn't recognize the change, click the Clear Chat History button and restate your question.
Note: Clearing your chat history removes all previous context from the chatbot's memory.
Why this is important: Resetting ensures the AI does not carry over irrelevant information, which could lead to confusion or inaccurate answers.

5. Provide Enough Context

Include Background Information: The more context you provide, the better the chatbot can understand and respond to your question.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the best practices?"
Try: "In the context of Family Medicine education, what are the best practices for integrating clinical simulations into the curriculum?"
Why this is important: Specific goals, constraints, or preferences allow the AI to tailor its responses to your unique needs.

6. Ask One Question at a Time

Break Down Complex Queries: If you have multiple questions, ask them separately.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the requirements for faculty development, how do I register for conferences, and what grants are available?"
Try: Start with "What are the faculty development requirements for Family Medicine educators?" Then follow up with your other questions after receiving the response.
Why this is important: This approach ensures each question gets full attention and a complete answer.

Examples of Good vs. Bad Prompts

Bad Prompt

"What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's bad: The AI Chat Assistant has no information about your background or needs.

Good Prompt

"I'm the chair of the Department of Family Medicine at a major university, and I plan to retire next year. I'd like to stay involved with Family Medicine education. What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's good: The AI Chat Assistant knows your role, your future plans, and your interest in staying involved, enabling it to provide more relevant advice.

Double Check Important Information

While the AI Chat Assistant is a helpful tool, it can still produce inaccurate or incomplete responses. Always verify critical information with reliable sources or colleagues before taking action.

Technical Limitations

The Chat Assistant:

  • Cannot access external websites or open links
  • Cannot process or view images
  • Cannot make changes to STFM systems or process transactions
  • Cannot access real-time information (like your STFM Member Profile information)

STFM AI Assistant
Disclaimer: The STFM Assistant can make mistakes. Check important information.