Other Publications

Education Columns

A Team-Based Approach to Resident Education in the Assessment and Treatment of Adult ADHD in Primary Care

by Gabriela Gibson-Lopez, PsyD; University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Background

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurobehavioral condition common in children and adolescents that can persist into adulthood. Among adults who meet criteria for ADHD, few receive treatment for their symptoms. Given how many children are initially diagnosed with ADHD by their primary care provider (PCP), it is reasonable to assume that many adults will also present to their PCP for evaluation of ADHD. Unfortunately, many PCPs struggle with diagnosing and treating adult ADHD for various reasons including diagnostic complexity, lack of time, lack of experience, or lack of confidence in determining optimal treatment regimens.3, 6 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that family physicians demonstrate competence in diagnosing, managing, and integrating care for common mental health issues in patients of all ages.2 Therefore, addressing this gap in knowledge and skills related to adult ADHD is imperative.

 

Intervention

The family medicine residency at University of Texas Health San Antonio has three full-time behavioral science faculty and uses the Primary Care Behavioral Health model of integration, which is a team-based primary care approach to managing behavioral health problems and biopsychosocial-influenced health conditions.5 Within this model are clinical pathways that are a multidisciplinary management tool developed to improve outcomes for a target group of patients, using evidence-based practice and resources available. The clinical pathway allows for assessing and treating adult ADHD by the behavioral health faculty with the aim of helping resident physicians feel more confident in assessing and treating adult ADHD. We turned to the existing but limited research for guidance on developing such a pathway in primary care.4,7 Patients were identified by resident physicians and referred to a behavioral health consultant for a two-visit screening process that included a contextual interview, review of medical records, narrow and broadband self-report measures, and an assessment of ADHD symptoms and functioning. The results of the screening process were shared with the referring resident physician with recommendations for treatment.

 

Results

After 1 ½ years of implementing the clinical pathway, a six-item survey was created and sent to the family medicine residents to assess their use of the pathway, satisfaction with the pathway, likeliness to continue to use the pathway, and the impact of the pathway on their confidence in assessing and treating adult ADHD in primary care. The survey had a 78% response rate among our 42 resident physicians. Only 40% of the respondents indicated having used the pathway. Satisfaction, usefulness, and likeliness were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale where higher scores indicated higher satisfaction, usefulness, and likeliness. Overall, residents were satisfied with the pathway, reported the pathway as useful, and indicated that they would likely continue to use the pathway (Table 1). Seventy-six percent reported that the pathway increased their confidence in assessing and treating adult ADHD. Residents were given the opportunity to provide a qualitative answer expanding how the pathway increased their confidence. One resident shared, “I previously felt uneasy with prescription of medications without being able to spend the time to confirm diagnosis or history from the patient and need for medication.” Another shared, “Reading the notes from BHC has helped me to understand better how I would structure and focus an interview/history for ADHD screening in the future.”

Table 1: Adult ADHD Clinical Pathway-Physician Satisfaction Survey

 

n (Persons)

Yes

No

Have you referred an adult patient for an ADHD screening to a BHC?

33

13 (39.39%)

20 (60.61%)

 

n (Persons)

Mean

Standard  Deviation

Satisfaction with pathway

13

4.38

1.00

Usefulness of pathway

13

4.46

0.75

Likeliness to continue using pathway

13

4.46

1.01

 

n (Persons)

Yes

No

Has engaging BHC for an adult ADHD screening helped increase your confidence in treating adult patients with ADHD?

13

10 (76.92%)

3 (23.08%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BHC, behavioral health consultant.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that an interdisciplinary approach and clinical pathways can support family medicine resident education in the assessment of adult ADHD in primary care. Such an approach can also help increase confidence in treating adult ADHD. The two most-reported barriers to utilizing the pathway were identified as a lack of time to introduce the pathway and a lack of knowledge of the existence of the pathway. We have been addressing the latter through continuous reminders about the pathway during team meetings and encouraging residents to utilize the pathway before initiating medications when the diagnostic picture is unclear. With growing demand for integrated and interprofessional training experiences in family medicine, we also hope to continue developing interdisciplinary approaches to target other behavioral health issues commonly seen in primary care and assess their impact on resident education.1

 

References

  1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine. Common Program Requirements. Accessed March 3, 2022. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/120_FamilyMedicine_2020.pdf
  2. American Academy of Family Physicians. Recommended Curriculum Guidelines for Family Medicine Residents- Human Behavior and Mental Health Reprint No. 270. Family Medicine Residency Curriculum Guidelines. Accessed March 3, 2022. from https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint270_Mental.pdf
  3. Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill M. Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians. Prim Psychiatry. 2009:16.
  4. Loskutova NY, Lutgen CB, Callen EF, Filippi MK, Robertson EA. Evaluating a Web-Based Adult ADHD Toolkit for Primary Care Clinicians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(4):741-752. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200606
  5. Robinson PJ, Reiter JT. Behavioral Consultation and Primary Care: A Guide to Integrating Services Second Edition. Springer International Publishing; 2019.
  6. Searight HR, Burke JM, Rottnek F. Adult ADHD: evaluation and treatment in family medicine. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62(9):2077-2086, 2091-2092.
  7. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. (2014). Screening, Referral and Treatment for Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) – Adult – Ambulatory Clinical Practice Guideline. 2014. https://ghcscw.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/Clinical_Practice_Guidelines/18_CPG_ADHD_Adult.pdf
Ask a Question
AI Chatbot Tips

Tips for Using STFM's AI Assistant

STFM's AI Assistant is designed to help you find information and answers about Family Medicine education. While it's a powerful tool, getting the best results depends on how you phrase your questions. Here's how to make the most of your interactions:

1. Avoid Ambiguous Language

Be Clear and Specific: Use precise terms and avoid vague words like "it" or "that" without clear references.

Example:

Instead of: "Can you help me with that?"
Try: "Can you help me update our Family Medicine clerkship curriculum?"
Why this is important: Ambiguous language can confuse the AI, leading to irrelevant or unclear responses. Clear references help the chatbot understand exactly what you're asking.

2. Use Specific Terms

Identify the Subject Clearly: Clearly state the subject or area you need information about.

Example:

Instead of: "What resources does STFM provide?"
Try: "I'm a new program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship. What STFM resources are available to help me design or update clerkship curricula?"
Why this is better: Providing details about your role ("program coordinator") and your goal ("design or update clerkship curricula") gives the chatbot enough context to offer more targeted information.

3. Don't Assume the AI Knows Everything

Provide Necessary Details:The STFM AI Assistant has been trained on STFM's business and resources. The AI can only use the information you provide or that it has been trained on.

Example:

Instead of: "How can I improve my program?"
Try: "As a program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship, what resources does STFM provide to help me improve student engagement and learning outcomes?"
Why this is important: Including relevant details helps the AI understand your specific situation, leading to more accurate and useful responses.

4. Reset if You Change Topics

Clear Chat History When Switching Topics:

If you move to a completely new topic and the chatbot doesn't recognize the change, click the Clear Chat History button and restate your question.
Note: Clearing your chat history removes all previous context from the chatbot's memory.
Why this is important: Resetting ensures the AI does not carry over irrelevant information, which could lead to confusion or inaccurate answers.

5. Provide Enough Context

Include Background Information: The more context you provide, the better the chatbot can understand and respond to your question.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the best practices?"
Try: "In the context of Family Medicine education, what are the best practices for integrating clinical simulations into the curriculum?"
Why this is important: Specific goals, constraints, or preferences allow the AI to tailor its responses to your unique needs.

6. Ask One Question at a Time

Break Down Complex Queries: If you have multiple questions, ask them separately.

Example:

Instead of: "What are the requirements for faculty development, how do I register for conferences, and what grants are available?"
Try: Start with "What are the faculty development requirements for Family Medicine educators?" Then follow up with your other questions after receiving the response.
Why this is important: This approach ensures each question gets full attention and a complete answer.

Examples of Good vs. Bad Prompts

Bad Prompt

"What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's bad: The AI Chat Assistant has no information about your background or needs.

Good Prompt

"I'm the chair of the Department of Family Medicine at a major university, and I plan to retire next year. I'd like to stay involved with Family Medicine education. What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's good: The AI Chat Assistant knows your role, your future plans, and your interest in staying involved, enabling it to provide more relevant advice.

Double Check Important Information

While the AI Chat Assistant is a helpful tool, it can still produce inaccurate or incomplete responses. Always verify critical information with reliable sources or colleagues before taking action.

Technical Limitations

The Chat Assistant:

  • Cannot access external websites or open links
  • Cannot process or view images
  • Cannot make changes to STFM systems or process transactions
  • Cannot access real-time information (like your STFM Member Profile information)

STFM AI Assistant
Disclaimer: The STFM Assistant can make mistakes. Check important information.