Other Publications

Education Columns

Integrating Pain Specialty Care in Family Medicine and Internal Medicine Residency Clinics

by Sara L. Jackson, MD, MPH, Jane Huntington, MD, Debra B. Gordon, RN, DNP, Daniel Krashin, MD, Ivan Lesnik, MD, Jane C. Ballantyne, MD

Background
As our nation continues to struggle with the effects of widespread opioid addiction, primary care physicians who care for patients with chronic pain are increasingly being asked to expand the care they provide to include non-pharmacologic treatments.1  Recent CDC guidelines recommend the careful consideration of new or continued opioid prescribing, employing risk mitigation strategies, and shared decision making for maintenance of high opioid doses.2 This approach is new for any primary care physician, and may be particularly challenging for residents. Building in support for residents as they learn to manage patients with complex chronic pain is key to developing a primary care workforce ready to employ new strategies to care for these patients. It was our hypothesis that providing access to pain specialty attendings within the residency clinic would help to meet these training challenges.

Project Overview
Both the Family Medicine Clinic and the Adult Medicine Clinic, which are academic primary care residency clinics at Harborview Medical Center, a safety-net hospital in Seattle, invited a pain medicine specialist to two half-day clinic sessions each month. During these sessions, patients with chronic pain were scheduled for a visit with their faculty or resident primary care provider; or if that physician was unavailable, they were scheduled with another resident or the clinical pharmacist. The patient was evaluated in a co-visit with the primary care team and the pain medicine specialist, who modeled discussions with patients to foster a comprehensive approach to pain management with appropriate discussion, education and risk mitigation strategies. The specialists were available during the clinic for case conferences and informal discussions of evidence-based practices for care of patients with chronic pain. Residents were invited to formally and informally consult the specialist during the sessions.

The specialists became catalysts for comprehensive multi-disciplinary pain treatment, supporting residents and faculty and their patients in seeking new approaches to pain treatment while deemphasizing opioid use, referrals to peer-support groups, mental health care, physical therapy, and buprenorphine treatment were encouraged.

Impact
Faculty and residents at the clinics were sent an anonymous survey before the integrated sessions began and 1 year later to measure changes in their confidence in providing successful treatment for patients with chronic pain. Responses were analyzed using a t-test for equality of means.
On a seven point scale, self-ratings of confidence and of clinic resources improved between 15% and 21%, all at significant levels (p<0.05); see Table 1 for detailed pre- and post-intervention survey results. 

Conclusions
Access to expert pain care within primary care residency clinics can benefit patients with chronic pain and can be an important educational resource for resident training. Residents working with pain medicine consultants learned to provide care for patients with chronic pain with comprehensive therapies that minimized exposure to opioids. As reimbursement moves towards quality measures, our model of integrating pain specialists within primary care medical homes could be realistic in residencies located in academic medical centers and integrated group practices. Residencies in rural settings, with less access to pain specialty care, could benefit from growing access to telemedicine specialty consultation.
3

We conclude that close partnership between primary care providers and pain medicine specialists, especially in settings where residents are training, improves provider confidence and may even affect future practice as residents carry forward these experiences. This model demystifies the management of chronic pain by incorporating care for patients with chronic pain—like any chronic illness—in the primary care medical home. Integrating a pain medicine specialist in a primary care clinic several sessions a month may be a practical way to care for most patients with chronic pain, reserving pain clinics for only patients with the most complex and refractory disease. Residency clinics can lead the way in this care transformation.

Acknowledgement
We are grateful to our patients for trusting us to care for them, and we thank the Harborview primary care providers, pain medicine specialists, and staff for their engagement in improving the lives of people with chronic pain.
 

References:

  1. Schneiderhan J, Clauw D, Schwenk TL. Primary care of patients with chronic pain. JAMA 2017; 317(23):2367-2368. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.578.
  2. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA 2016;315(15):1624-1645.
  3. Shelley BM, Katzman JG, Comerci GD Jr, et al. ECHO pain curriculum: balancing mandated continuing education with the needs of rural health care practitioners. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2017;37(3):190-194.
Ask a Question
AI Chatbot Tips

Tips for Using STFM's AI Assistant

STFM's AI Assistant is designed to help you find information and answers about Family Medicine education. While it's a powerful tool, getting the best results depends on how you phrase your questions. Here's how to make the most of your interactions:

1. Avoid Ambiguous Language

Be Clear and Specific: Use precise terms and avoid vague words like "it" or "that" without clear references.

Example:
Instead of: "Can you help me with that?"
Try: "Can you help me update our Family Medicine clerkship curriculum?"
Why this is important: Ambiguous language can confuse the AI, leading to irrelevant or unclear responses. Clear references help the chatbot understand exactly what you're asking.

2. Use Specific Terms

Identify the Subject Clearly: Clearly state the subject or area you need information about.

Example:
Instead of: "What resources does STFM provide?"
Try: "I'm a new program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship. What STFM resources are available to help me design or update clerkship curricula?"
Why this is better: Providing details about your role ("program coordinator") and your goal ("design or update clerkship curricula") gives the chatbot enough context to offer more targeted information.

3. Don't Assume the AI Knows Everything

Provide Necessary Details:The STFM AI Assistant has been trained on STFM's business and resources. The AI can only use the information you provide or that it has been trained on.

Example:
Instead of: "How can I improve my program?"
Try: "As a program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship, what resources does STFM provide to help me improve student engagement and learning outcomes?"
Why this is important: Including relevant details helps the AI understand your specific situation, leading to more accurate and useful responses.

4. Reset if You Change Topics

Clear Chat History When Switching Topics:

If you move to a completely new topic and the chatbot doesn't recognize the change, click the Clear Chat History button and restate your question.
Note: Clearing your chat history removes all previous context from the chatbot's memory.
Why this is important: Resetting ensures the AI does not carry over irrelevant information, which could lead to confusion or inaccurate answers.

5. Provide Enough Context

Include Background Information: The more context you provide, the better the chatbot can understand and respond to your question.

Example:
Instead of: "What are the best practices?"
Try: "In the context of Family Medicine education, what are the best practices for integrating clinical simulations into the curriculum?"
Why this is important: Specific goals, constraints, or preferences allow the AI to tailor its responses to your unique needs.

6. Ask One Question at a Time

Break Down Complex Queries: If you have multiple questions, ask them separately.

Example:
Instead of: "What are the requirements for faculty development, how do I register for conferences, and what grants are available?"
Try: Start with "What are the faculty development requirements for Family Medicine educators?" Then follow up with your other questions after receiving the response.
Why this is important: This approach ensures each question gets full attention and a complete answer.

Examples of Good vs. Bad Prompts

Bad Prompt

"What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's bad: The AI Chat Assistant has no information about your background or needs.

Good Prompt

"I'm the chair of the Department of Family Medicine at a major university, and I plan to retire next year. I'd like to stay involved with Family Medicine education. What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's good: The AI Chat Assistant knows your role, your future plans, and your interest in staying involved, enabling it to provide more relevant advice.

Double Check Important Information

While the AI Chat Assistant is a helpful tool, it can still produce inaccurate or incomplete responses. Always verify critical information with reliable sources or colleagues before taking action.

Technical Limitations

The Chat Assistant:

  • Cannot access external websites or open links
  • Cannot process or view images
  • Cannot make changes to STFM systems or process transactions
  • Cannot access real-time information (like your STFM Member Profile information)

STFM AI Assistant
Disclaimer: The STFM Assistant can make mistakes. Check important information.