Other Publications

Education Columns

Assessment of Firearm Violence Prevention in Medical School Curricula

Brooke Schwartz, BSc, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL; Praveen D. Wickremasinghe, BA, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL; Cesar Larancuent, BSc, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL; Gregory W. Schneider, MD, Roseman University College of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV; Rachel Clarke, PhD, CHES, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL; Prasad B. Bhoite, MPH, MBA, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL

 

Introduction

Firearm-related injuries remain a leading cause of preventable death in the United States (US) annually1. Unsafe firearm practices lead to accidental and intentional injuries, including suicide2,3. Public health practitioners and medical educators recognize firearm violence as a crisis, yet most medical school curricula in the US lack any education on gun safety4.  On surveys, most medical students feel uncomfortable with or are likely to avoid the topic altogether in future practice5.  Our medical student and faculty team developed and implemented a pilot gun safety curriculum.

Methods

We created an evidence-based Firearm Violence Prevention (FVP) Curriculum Guide, published it on the American Medical Student Association website, and piloted it at our institution6. Schools can deliver the curriculum as a single- or multiple-session intervention and assess educational effectiveness. The focus is on discussing FVP with patients and on gun violence as a public health concern, not as a political topic.  After a single-session training at Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, 2nd-year students took pre- and post-session self-assessment questionnaires. Pre- and post-session average values for the categorical survey responses were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Changes in pre-session to post-session survey scores show attitudes about gun violence as a public health issue did not change significantly.  Pre- and post-session scores for comfort in querying patients about gun ownership and counseling about gun safety did change significantly (p<0.01). Medical students’ perceived role in gun safety as well as comfort in educating fellow peers also differed significantly from pretest to posttest (p<0.01).

Conclusion

In our pilot, student attitudes regarding gun violence did not change, consistent with the emphasis on patient education and “firearm safety” rather than “gun control.” One study limitation was the inability to use participant identifiers, so we could not track individual attitude changes before and after the session. In subsequent sessions, we hope to use additional post-session questions that assess impacts on anticipated future actions by our learners.  The project team encourages schools nationwide to use and evaluate the FVP Curriculum Guide. Our pilot suggests that students find the curriculum effective, and other institutions can build on this experience.

References:

  1. Stark DE, Shah NH. Funding and Publication of Research on Gun Violence and Other Leading Causes of Death. 2017;317(1):84–85. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.16215
  2. Solnick SJ, Hemenway D. Unintentional firearm deaths in the United States 2005–2015. Injury Epidemiology. 2019;6(1):42. doi:10.1186/s40621-019-0220-0.
  3. Gun Violence in America: An Analysis of 2018 CDC Data, EFSGV, Feb. 2020, https://www.wboy.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/05/Gun-Violence-in-America_An-Analysis-of-2018-CDC-Data_February2020.pdf.
  4. Yanes AF. Gun Violence and Firearm Safety in Medical School Curricula: Missed Opportunities to Improve Patient Health. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):11–12. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6734
  5. Pallin R, Teasdale S, Agnoli A, Spitzer S, Asif-Sattar R, Wintemute GJ, Barnhorst A. Talking about firearm injury prevention with patients: a survey of medical residents. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03024-9. Erratum in: BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):126. PMID: 34980095; PMCID: PMC8725249.
  6. Schwartz B, Wickremasinghe P, Larancuent C, O'Meara M, Ezzi A, Denton A. Integrating Firearm Safety Into Medical School Curricula . American Medical Student Association. https://www.amsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/MSGS-FVP-Curriculum.pdf. Published 2021. Accessed December 9, 2022.
Ask a Question
AI Chatbot Tips

Tips for Using STFM's AI Assistant

STFM's AI Assistant is designed to help you find information and answers about Family Medicine education. While it's a powerful tool, getting the best results depends on how you phrase your questions. Here's how to make the most of your interactions:

1. Avoid Ambiguous Language

Be Clear and Specific: Use precise terms and avoid vague words like "it" or "that" without clear references.

Example:
Instead of: "Can you help me with that?"
Try: "Can you help me update our Family Medicine clerkship curriculum?"
Why this is important: Ambiguous language can confuse the AI, leading to irrelevant or unclear responses. Clear references help the chatbot understand exactly what you're asking.

2. Use Specific Terms

Identify the Subject Clearly: Clearly state the subject or area you need information about.

Example:
Instead of: "What resources does STFM provide?"
Try: "I'm a new program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship. What STFM resources are available to help me design or update clerkship curricula?"
Why this is better: Providing details about your role ("program coordinator") and your goal ("design or update clerkship curricula") gives the chatbot enough context to offer more targeted information.

3. Don't Assume the AI Knows Everything

Provide Necessary Details:The STFM AI Assistant has been trained on STFM's business and resources. The AI can only use the information you provide or that it has been trained on.

Example:
Instead of: "How can I improve my program?"
Try: "As a program coordinator for a Family Medicine clerkship, what resources does STFM provide to help me improve student engagement and learning outcomes?"
Why this is important: Including relevant details helps the AI understand your specific situation, leading to more accurate and useful responses.

4. Reset if You Change Topics

Clear Chat History When Switching Topics:

If you move to a completely new topic and the chatbot doesn't recognize the change, click the Clear Chat History button and restate your question.
Note: Clearing your chat history removes all previous context from the chatbot's memory.
Why this is important: Resetting ensures the AI does not carry over irrelevant information, which could lead to confusion or inaccurate answers.

5. Provide Enough Context

Include Background Information: The more context you provide, the better the chatbot can understand and respond to your question.

Example:
Instead of: "What are the best practices?"
Try: "In the context of Family Medicine education, what are the best practices for integrating clinical simulations into the curriculum?"
Why this is important: Specific goals, constraints, or preferences allow the AI to tailor its responses to your unique needs.

6. Ask One Question at a Time

Break Down Complex Queries: If you have multiple questions, ask them separately.

Example:
Instead of: "What are the requirements for faculty development, how do I register for conferences, and what grants are available?"
Try: Start with "What are the faculty development requirements for Family Medicine educators?" Then follow up with your other questions after receiving the response.
Why this is important: This approach ensures each question gets full attention and a complete answer.

Examples of Good vs. Bad Prompts

Bad Prompt

"What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's bad: The AI Chat Assistant has no information about your background or needs.

Good Prompt

"I'm the chair of the Department of Family Medicine at a major university, and I plan to retire next year. I'd like to stay involved with Family Medicine education. What type of membership is best for me?"

Why it's good: The AI Chat Assistant knows your role, your future plans, and your interest in staying involved, enabling it to provide more relevant advice.

Double Check Important Information

While the AI Chat Assistant is a helpful tool, it can still produce inaccurate or incomplete responses. Always verify critical information with reliable sources or colleagues before taking action.

Technical Limitations

The Chat Assistant:

  • Cannot access external websites or open links
  • Cannot process or view images
  • Cannot make changes to STFM systems or process transactions
  • Cannot access real-time information (like your STFM Member Profile information)

STFM AI Assistant
Disclaimer: The STFM Assistant can make mistakes. Check important information.